|
|
Post by lordkundalini on Jan 15, 2021 10:48:57 GMT -7
my commentary was regarding the comedy in a media organization printing a headline saying "what is the global hum" and the conclusion that there is no global hum. literally nothing to do with you. did you feel bad because the headline made you click the article and i called it clickbait? feel free to keep arguing with yourself and pretending its me though this was the conclusion: Thus he believes there is no external, physical source. Rather, he argues it involves a neurological element: “This is caused by something internal – some internally generated perception of sound. But we need to know the trigger and what kind of exposures might be necessary. We also need to know other things the population might have in common that could help explain this.”
Ultimately, the Hum remains a mystery and MacPherson’s search for its source continues.
believes!!!!!!! thats not the same as knowledge is it?
people hear it all over the world. isnt all over the world global?
simple logic bro!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by lordkundalini on Jan 15, 2021 10:51:59 GMT -7
ill take a belief stemming from experience over this guys belief who admits he dont know what it is and never experienced it.
and you cant rule out something more complex, mystical, spiritual ect.
something science simply cannot measure.
|
|
|
|
Post by bear on Jan 15, 2021 11:12:51 GMT -7
we can definitely rule out the possibility that you will refrain from inserting your own personal fantasy when presented with missing information
|
|
|
|
Post by lordkundalini on Jan 15, 2021 11:18:03 GMT -7
we can definitely rule out the possibility that you will refrain from inserting your own personal fantasy when presented with missing information you are the one posting the article and pretending to refute what I posted. . stop making declarative statements when all you have is belief and well as the source you posted. sounds like your personal fantasy.. I just find it interesting. I have no idea what they are hearing nor do you or McPhearson.
sorry bro
you are in lash out mode today. cheer up!!! coming at me wont change you or whatever you are going thru. but Im here for you!!
this was the conclusion:
Thus he believes there is no external, physical source. Rather, he argues it involves a neurological element: “This is caused by something internal – some internally generated perception of sound. But we need to know the trigger and what kind of exposures might be necessary. We also need to know other things the population might have in common that could help explain this.”
Ultimately, the Hum remains a mystery and MacPherson’s search for its source continues.
believes!!!!!!! thats not the same as knowledge is it?
people hear it all over the world. isnt all over the world global?
simple logic bro!!!!
this was the conclusion.
|
|
|
|
Post by lordkundalini on Jan 15, 2021 11:21:29 GMT -7
this is what you posted: What is this mysterious global hum? It's not a hum and it's not global! based on this conclusion?>: Thus he believes there is no external, physical source. Rather, he argues it involves a neurological element: “This is caused by something internal – some internally generated perception of sound. But we need to know the trigger and what kind of exposures might be necessary. We also need to know other things the population might have in common that could help explain this.”
Ultimately, the Hum remains a mystery and MacPherson’s search for its source continues.
how do you know its not a hum and people are hearing it all over the world. isnt that global?
you have weak game today!
|
|
|
|
Post by bear on Jan 15, 2021 11:28:30 GMT -7
“This is caused by something internal – some internally generated perception of sound."
My favorite part is how you keep posting this and ignoring it
|
|
|
|
Post by lordkundalini on Jan 15, 2021 11:41:55 GMT -7
“This is caused by something internal – some internally generated perception of sound." My favorite part is how you keep posting this and ignoring it did you ignore this in the conclusion: Thus he believes there is no external, physical source. Rather, he argues it involves a neurological element:
His belief is not proof. you get that right.? well maybe you didnt cause you make declarative statement yet all you rely on is the belief of another. thats not very robust
you posted :
It's not a hum and it's not global!
and you posted an article about what this guy Believes he may be right or may be wrong. at this point its just belief, like people believing the election was stolen from Trump
its not my fault you cant support your declarative statement and instead lash out at me.
do better next time.
|
|
|
|
Post by lordkundalini on Jan 15, 2021 11:42:29 GMT -7
Ultimately, the Hum remains a mystery and MacPherson’s search for its source continues.
|
|
|
|
Post by bear on Jan 15, 2021 11:53:18 GMT -7
Can it be global if it IS internal? I think not.
|
|
|
|
Post by lordkundalini on Jan 15, 2021 11:59:55 GMT -7
Can it be global if it IS internal? I think not. that depends. what if its coming from mother Earth and the connection to the Earth some of us feel anyway. I wont assume you do. Is mother earth global? I think so. Do you?
once again, internal concept is just a BELIEF at this point. You havent shown it be to external or internal with any FACT.
you keep trying to get around that all you have and your article is a BELIEF and you are trying to pawn it off as fact.
so what we have is people all over the world hearing a hum. and then beliefs on what that is.
your game is very weak today!
|
|
|
|
Post by bear on Jan 15, 2021 12:02:09 GMT -7
hearing is a sense that has an external stimulus. there is no proof they are hearing a sound wave pushing air onto their eardrum. even the basic terms you are trying to explain your argument with are wrong.
|
|
|
|
Post by bear on Jan 15, 2021 12:03:13 GMT -7
can you describe the performance of "my game" in greater detail please? i dont understand
|
|
|
|
Post by lordkundalini on Jan 15, 2021 12:07:57 GMT -7
hearing is a sense that has an external stimulus. there is no proof they are hearing a sound wave pushing air onto their eardrum. even the basic terms you are trying to explain your argument with are wrong. agreed. but we can make no conclusions til we know whats actually happening right?
and there is no proof there isnt external stimuli, yet you in your infinite wisdom can declare they hear nothing. How do you know to make such a statement. I dont accept your belief as fact. sorry
you should stop making declarative statements you cant support.
this is simple logic.
you are really trying hard to wiggle out of your mistake.. lol
|
|
|
|
Post by lordkundalini on Jan 15, 2021 12:08:12 GMT -7
can you describe the performance of "my game" in greater detail please? i dont understand agreed. you dont understand.
Thus he believes there is no external, physical source. Rather, he argues it involves a neurological element:
belief is not fact. you cant get around that. sorry!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by bear on Jan 15, 2021 12:13:21 GMT -7
there is no mistake. you have been arguing against the conclusion the entire time. i havent done anything but attempt to explain to you what the article says. it literally never was my opinion or belief. you have created an enemy in me that exists only in your mind and you should probably stop this tirade because all it amounts to is you not understanding the content. very telling about your rational capabilities.
|
|
|
|
Post by bear on Jan 15, 2021 12:17:55 GMT -7
now we are at the point where a good faith attempt has been made to communicate a simple foundational understanding with which to proceed with a discussion. it appears to have failed, so in your steadfast commitment to letting me live rent free in your head, i will begin making jokes at your expense.
|
|
|
|
Post by bear on Jan 15, 2021 12:18:29 GMT -7
is this your belief system?  the aliens must be on the back |
|
|
|
Post by lordkundalini on Jan 15, 2021 12:18:52 GMT -7
there is no mistake. you have been arguing against the conclusion the entire time. i havent done anything but attempt to explain to you what the article says. it literally never was my opinion or belief. you have created an enemy in me that exists only in your mind and you should probably stop this tirade because all it amounts to is you not understanding the content. very telling about your rational capabilities. you posted this: What is this mysterious global hum? It's not a hum and it's not global!
and the conclusion is this:
Thus he believes there is no external, physical source. Rather, he argues it involves a neurological element: “This is caused by something internal – some internally generated perception of sound. But we need to know the trigger and what kind of exposures might be necessary. We also need to know other things the population might have in common that could help explain this.”
Ultimately, the Hum remains a mystery and MacPherson’s search for its source continues.
if the hum remains a mystery according to the article you posted then how do you declare: It's not a hum and it's not global
thats your mistake.
had you said You believe It's not a hum and it's not global, then all would be good. but you didnt. you made a mistake.
|
|
|
|
Post by lordkundalini on Jan 15, 2021 12:20:36 GMT -7
poor beard. getting all personal and lashing out
the article he posted contradicted the statement of fact he made.
he is not having a good day logic wise.
|
|
|
|
Post by bear on Jan 15, 2021 12:21:02 GMT -7
|
|
