2024

Check out this article from Coloradoan:

Wondering who Lauren Boebert might face? These candidates are vying for the 4th District

www.coloradoan.com/story/news/local/2024/01/08/here-are-the-candidates-for-colorados-4th-congressional-district-ahead-of-june-primary/72049964007/

1 Democratic candidate and 1 Republican candidate have pending legal cases against them.

Dude do you not think the mainstream media would absolutely LOVE and go nuts over a "progressive upstart taking on the establishment?" They would be shitting on themselves for anyone even remotely viable...

But unfortunately she is not that person. She's just not.

I was going to say, Biden's obviously.

Biden was the first president I voted for that actually won but I don’t think he can beat Trump again. I usually pick the loser tho

What? Hard disagree. This is a fantasy. You will never, ever, ever see a progressive presidential candidate get positive coverage on CNN or msnbc.

It was kind of funny when Bernie was running and drawing massive crowds of people with tons of energy, and that got almost zero coverage on any news station, while they would keep the camera on trump's empty podium for eternity. Msnbc hated Bernie's guts. They are the establishment. This is the problem.

And for the record I wanted Warren in 2020.

"But not my loan so fuck him."

Now this

How 'bout instead of asking people to just trust what you say about polling results that aren't reflected in the mainstream polling aggregate websites and that I can't find with Google searches just make it easy for everybody and post the links to these polls showing Williamson in double digits all over the place that you're referring to. For all I know Google ain't giving me the best results because of my location - sometimes I gotta weed out irrelevant local (to me) results when I search things but on this I'm getting all English language results.

I never understand when people make claims which they say are obvious and where they say have proof, but then say they can't be bothered posting links and that people need to do their own research and find this information on their own. I'm not saying you're one of those people because they are always filled with shit and I know you're being sincere in your beliefs - but maybe these polls you're referring to are ancient. I am saying that if I want to prove a point I'm trying to make I'll post links to back up my claims without needing to be asked to do so because it's the fastest and easiest way to make a point without a bunch of time wasting back and forth. Since you're saying you've been following this fairly closely it sounds like you've not only seen these polls showing the support you keep saying she has, but know where to look to find them. So do us a solid. Convince me and other skeptics in the fastest and easiest way possible, post the links, and we'll at least be able to agree on what her current level of support is. As the fond saying here goes: "No. 1s or nans."