|
|
Post by chronicircle on Dec 11, 2020 8:14:34 GMT -7
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 11, 2020 8:22:28 GMT -7
Ya agree with you. Fauci has done more for us then Biden/Harris. |
|
|
|
Post by Zeewada on Dec 11, 2020 8:40:05 GMT -7
what a joke. they havent accomplished anything yet.
|
|
|
|
Post by chronicircle on Dec 11, 2020 8:44:23 GMT -7
so i looked back at the history seems like they typically just name the election winner person of the year. trump in 2016, obama in 2012 and 2008. G Dubya in 2004 and 2000, Clinton before that.
still think it shoulda been the front line workers. kinda a slap in the face if you ask me.
|
|
|
|
Post by autophil74 on Dec 11, 2020 8:50:01 GMT -7
terrible choice
|
|
|
|
Post by autophil74 on Dec 11, 2020 8:50:49 GMT -7
Let's build this guy up a whole lot so that we can shit all over him when he inherits the mess that trump has created
this isn't going to be good for democrats...
|
|
|
|
Post by autophil74 on Dec 11, 2020 8:52:09 GMT -7
Joe Biden would be the first person to tell you he doesn't deserve that distinction
|
|
|
|
Post by Don Swifty on Dec 11, 2020 8:53:02 GMT -7
#ripoff, for all the reasons mentioned above and I'm sure more.
Fauci, health care workers, and the movement for racial justice get "Guardians Of The Year." wtf is that? Booby prize?
|
|
|
|
Post by bear on Dec 11, 2020 9:09:04 GMT -7
Shoulda been Johnny Depp. Wtf
|
|
|
|
Post by frododoknobo on Dec 11, 2020 9:12:13 GMT -7
I support the decision, strictly because it will piss Trump off.
|
|
|
|
Post by hokiejoe on Dec 11, 2020 9:17:30 GMT -7
I think it should have been the health care workers, not Fauci. That being said the precedent for incoming Presidents is there and Harris is the first woman VP the first black and Asian VP. Getting rid of the nightmare that is Trump is also a pretty big factor.
|
|
|
|
Post by Don Swifty on Dec 11, 2020 9:22:37 GMT -7
I support the decision, strictly because it will piss Trump off. The only thing I like about their pick. Maybe the Time editors were thinking the same? |
|
|
|
Post by goodtimes on Dec 11, 2020 9:26:02 GMT -7
TIME jumped the shark when they gave woman of the year to the Bruce-kaityln Jenner for getting a sex change.
Wasn't it the same 'year' that she crashed her car and hurt/killed someone and brushed it under the rug with lawyers?
|
|
|
|
Post by bear on Dec 11, 2020 9:26:03 GMT -7
Controversy sells. We are talking about it, thus bolstering Time's dwindling relevance.
|
|
|
|
Post by goodtimes on Dec 11, 2020 9:26:25 GMT -7
Exactly ^
|
|
|
|
Post by Don Swifty on Dec 11, 2020 9:27:25 GMT -7
Speaking of dwindling relevance, in 2020 I'm kind of surprised anybody really gives a shit about who Time thinks is the person of the year.
|
|
|
|
Post by lordkundalini on Dec 11, 2020 9:31:55 GMT -7
fluff the system!!
more pointless, worthless propaganda.
Time's best corrupt system cog is a better descriptoin
|
|
|
|
Post by chronicircle on Dec 11, 2020 9:33:32 GMT -7
Speaking of dwindling relevance, in 2020 I'm kind of surprised anybody really gives a shit about who Time thinks is the person of the year. eh, its one of the few annual things people talk about each year though. maybe we don't all give a shit about it generally speaking, but it sparks conversation. and obviously the mass media still thinks people care about it, enough to report on it at least. |
|
|
|
Post by Don Swifty on Dec 11, 2020 9:38:00 GMT -7
I always looked at it as I do the Oscars. They may make some stupid picks from time to time, but it's their party/magazine, not some universally decided prize that affects me or negates my opinion, so I don't really concern myself if I don't agree.
|
|
|
|
Post by bear on Dec 11, 2020 9:45:24 GMT -7
Social media cancel mobs will ensure we all have the same opinion.
|
|
