ALL_GAS

I feel in cases like these, the accused needs to come out with a full description of their interpretation of the encounter and own any questionable approaches yet stand their ground if they believe something is being misrepresented or they felt they interpreted portions of the encounter differently than the accuser. Similarly, if one is going to accuse, be detailed in how the encounter became a victimization. Leaving unknowns doesn't allow for a true consideration for social, moral or legal justice and definitely doesn't allow for folks outside of or involved in the situation to learn from it. This is more in cases where its not a full on criminal situation and more of a social and moral issue. If the accuser cannot describe explicitly how the lines were crossed, how can they be evaluated for fault? If the accused cannot come out with a full description of their interpretation of the encounter, how could anyone consider that they may be wrongfully accused?

I would hope he would come out and describe the encounter, owning any potentially questionable or embarrassing details and apologizing for anything that he may now see as wrong. Vague statements seem to aggravate the situation but I can see a legal team insisting on that approach.

Time will tell.

Whatever happened with Win Butler?

Not saying he is right or innocent but what could she sue him for?

butt stuff