|
Post by ancientchad on Nov 6, 2024 12:33:38 GMT -7
One of the reasons The Dems got their clocks cleaned was because Joe Six-Pack thought they went TOO FAR left. So whatever they did to try and appease the progressives didn't work out so well. incorrect. So very, very incorrect. Maybe you're right. Like I said I don't know shit. What did the Turk tell you?
|
|
|
Post by Not your moms 🌮 on Nov 6, 2024 12:34:03 GMT -7
No. I don't think jerking is an option on k. Probably should have took a pic for later. It's an option, maybe not in the middle of a hole (ay oh) but, yeah... So much for being sober. I'm getting some k and razors and calling off work tonight. Does this conversation have you thinking about shaving that beard and buying some k?
|
|
|
Post by Don Swifty on Nov 6, 2024 12:35:30 GMT -7
Can hang the hat on local election, NY passed prop 1, so women don't get completely F'd in our state Order 66 eminent Don't get mad at me, I voted for the meteor It was actually Wu tang and Grateful Dead So basically a meteor of awesomeness So the right has said that this proposition would damage girls sports... What is your take? I'm not knowledgeable enough to know one way or another... But I'm not sold on allowing trans women to play women's sports... I'm ok with anyone being who they are... But it just doesn't seem fair. There's a women's volleyball player in college that is trans and she jumps higher and hits harder than anyone else out there. Opponents are forfeiting rather than playing her team. Would it be more fair to have men's sports, women's sports and then a third category? I'd add a fourth category: hopped up on whatever performance enhancing substance (legal or not) you can get into your body category. Let the roidsters have they're own events/leagues/performance records to break.
|
|
|
Post by bussit on Nov 6, 2024 12:37:57 GMT -7
incorrect. So very, very incorrect. Maybe you're right. Like I said I don't know shit. What did the Turk tell you? idk, would you like to hear my opinion?
|
|
|
Post by bear on Nov 6, 2024 12:39:50 GMT -7
On the national scale trans issues are harmful to the party because of how polarizing and heated the rhetoric is. Cool you appealed to a vocal minority. Guess what you lost. I'm just being realistic. Democrats need to learn how to read the room.
|
|
|
2024
Nov 6, 2024 12:40:00 GMT -7
via mobile
Post by bussit on Nov 6, 2024 12:40:00 GMT -7
I am going to check in on Cenk tho. He must be on fire
|
|
|
2024
Nov 6, 2024 12:41:19 GMT -7
Post by EddieBlake on Nov 6, 2024 12:41:19 GMT -7
My local elections also went blue. It helps that they actually show up and are doing something in the region. Something that cant be said on the national scale, Biden and Kamala dropped the ball EVERY chance they had. Should've showed SOME spine. Hopefully this is the last time I bother responding to you, but this is beyond nonsense. They accomplished a lot with a very divided Gov't, they just didn't accomplish the one thing that YOU wanted. They tried and did accomplish it for some, but the larger effort was struck down by the Republican dominated Supreme Court. You have already shown that you don't care about the realities of how the Government actually works (not how you want it to work). It's clear that you don't care that unemployment is down, wages are up, the market is through the roof, there are fewer people without health insurance than ever before, that someone finally got a massive infrastructure bill passed, that the CHIPS act went into effect, that crime is actually down despite what Fox news tells people every day and a bunch of tother shit while they continued to fight for minorities, LGBTQ+ people and unions. When you don't have supermajorities and the other side owns the courts, you can face reality about how much you can accomplish or you can stomp your feet because nobody paid your tab (even though they tried to). Let's see what the other side does for you for the next four years. Half-measures don't cut it and Kamala was ONLY half-measures as was Biden. It doesn't appeal to anybody and it lost them the election. The reality is they could've set the tone instead of playing it safe all the time and cutting blank checks to kill brown kids. Why would I care if Trump does nothing for me, Biden didn't either! He was the one I was expecting to do SOMETHING but couldn't because his brain is scrambled eggs. Maybe things would be different if he had the decency to let somebody else run from the beginning instead of looking like an old man shitting his pants on the national stage. Shrink flation has hit EVERYTHING and you're trying to claim things are great. It's fucking delusional.
|
|
|
Post by treetophigh on Nov 6, 2024 12:44:00 GMT -7
It's an option, maybe not in the middle of a hole (ay oh) but, yeah... So much for being sober. I'm getting some k and razors and calling off work tonight. Does this conversation have you thinking about shaving that beard and buying some k? No, my beard is sexy
|
|
|
Post by bear on Nov 6, 2024 12:44:06 GMT -7
^^ He didn't say we're great. He provided specific examples that they didn't accomplish nothing.
|
|
|
2024
Nov 6, 2024 12:46:14 GMT -7
Post by EddieBlake on Nov 6, 2024 12:46:14 GMT -7
^^ He didn't say we're great. He provided specific examples that they didn't accomplish nothing. Those things don't appear to be true when companies are taking more than ever while giving less than ever. Repeating the same failed talking points doesn't make them true.
|
|
|
2024
Nov 6, 2024 12:49:49 GMT -7
Post by Don Swifty on Nov 6, 2024 12:49:49 GMT -7
I would rather see them allowed to play mens sports dressed as a women that compete against women. In most cases it is clearly not fair. A third league where gender is not an issue would be fine too. Mostly it is an issue I am not concerned with. And sports uniforms, for the most part, are pretty asexual anyway. A hockey player wears the same gear no matter whether it's a men's or women's team. Same with basketball and soccer. I'd imagine for volleyball both sexes wear shorts and maybe women are in tank tops and guys in t-shirts. I don't have a problem with a biological male wearing a tank top in the men's league if they prefer it to a t-shirt.
|
|
|
Post by ferd on Nov 6, 2024 12:59:24 GMT -7
Bro, women's volleyball players wear spandex shorts and it's AMAZING. Thankfully, dudes do not
|
|
|
Post by deadphishbiscuits on Nov 6, 2024 13:00:51 GMT -7
So much for being sober. I'm getting some k and razors and calling off work tonight. Does this conversation have you thinking about shaving that beard and buying some k? No, my beard is sexy Sexy beard 2028? Here's your first vote
|
|
|
Post by Not your moms 🌮 on Nov 6, 2024 13:35:05 GMT -7
On the national scale trans issues are harmful to the party because of how polarizing and heated the rhetoric is. Cool you appealed to a vocal minority. Guess what you lost. I'm just being realistic. Democrats need to learn how to read the room. She would have been better off just saying. She was going to be tough on hate crimes and never even mention gender or trans anything. It seems that the concept of treating everyone nicely would cover that and not alienate people who are not so bright.
|
|
|
Post by bussit on Nov 6, 2024 13:49:28 GMT -7
The dems got creamed last night because they couldn't get enough of the American population to come out and vote for them to outvote the Republicans. Slice that any way you want.
Imo, The Republicans are unified in their shared message of hate and power. The democratic party as it exists today doesn't really have a base like that. They have shown how they govern and it just comes off like republican lite. There is just nothing to rally behind there for normal folks like me, probably most of us here. And I want to to dispell the idea that every American falls into either the republican or democratic side. There are lots of sides and personally the democratic party on the whole left me politically years ago. They have moved too far to my right and no longer represent me in a meaningful way. The Harris campaign did a shit job of appealing to those of us that are left of the dems. There is no 2 ways about that. There are sooo many people that would flood the poles to vote for a candidate that inspired a sense of hope for turning this country around but there wasn't much if any of that. Whatever Harris' promise for the future was, however you feel about it personally, it wasn't enough, not even close.
|
|
|
Post by EddieBlake on Nov 6, 2024 13:54:49 GMT -7
|
|
|
Post by Not your moms 🌮 on Nov 6, 2024 14:03:56 GMT -7
There are not enough genuinely progressive liberal thinkers to ever win an election based on numbers. The best bet. And I do not like it myself but it is probably the closest we ever will get and it is still a long shot. Is a break away party consisting of mostly moderate thinkers pulled from both parties that prioritize toned down liberal ideas while still appealing to the needs of average voters. Jobs, healthcare, environment, education and standing up against hatred and cooperate greed and toxic nationalism. While remaining patriotic and strong enough to pull from both sides.
Not that I see it as a likely option. But I do feel it's safe to say anyone that I totally support would appear far to radical to ever have a real chance.
|
|
|
Post by Don Swifty on Nov 6, 2024 14:08:24 GMT -7
I'm going to wait for the dust to settle and the professional political/media autopsies with all the nerdy stats to come out before drawing any final conclusion on why, exactly, the Dems lost. Until then, we're all just a bunch of fuckin' amateurs with amateur opinions - not that there's anything wrong with that. As bear says, free feel to vent.
But unless and until I read learned opinions saying it's the #1 reason, I'm not buying that it was lack of appeal to the youth vote that cost Harris the election and she would've won if only she offered to wipe out more student loan debt than the Biden administration already has. I'm open minded enough to accept it as the primary cause if that's what the data shows.
Plenty (perhaps all) of winning Presidential candidates have won despite not appealing to the youth vote at all. Are there any winning Presidential candidates in history where it can be shown (with receipts as opposed to only personal opinions) that what put them over the top was their focus on what appeals to the youth?
Nixon in '68 and '72 won without any sizeable youth support, during a time when the youth were pissed off (at him) and active, and where his law and order campaign was blatantly anti-youth. I remember Carter winning right after Watergate because he wasn't a Washington politician, not because he made the youth vote his #1 focus. Reagan and Bush didn't give a shit about young people's issues. I was in my mid-20's when Clinton ran and he didn't focus on the youth, more on people in his generation - "it's the economy, stupid." I don't recall any candidates in my lifetime who made youth issues their #1 campaign priority. Their campaigns were smart enough to know where the votes were and which blocks actually vote vs. those who might complain but don't vote.
This time was it because the angst-stage youth didn't show up (as usual)? Or was it some mix of other factors? Black and/or Latino dudes having culturally based issues on the idea of a (black?) woman being President? The general shift in Latino and black male support for Trump? Are stats going to suggest it was race and/or sex related and not enough of white America voted for her? Pro-choice GOP women who voted for reproductive rights in their state which gave them the opportunity to still vote for Trump? Harris couldn't overcome the low approval ratings of the Biden administration, inflation/prices, immigration etc.? Voters upset that they didn't have a say in choosing a candidate and were forced into accepting (or not) Harris who they didn't like as a candidate in '20? Who showed up and who stayed home? Did the Harris campaign research dept. figure that pressing too hard on eliminating student debt for everyone and no matter the amount or circumstances would've turned off more people who historically do vote, paid off their own student loans without govt. wiping it out, and would be resentful that Harris kowtowed to those who voluntarily signed the contract but now don't want to hold up their end of the contract when it comes to them paying back? Maybe that voting block who actually does vote are more concerned with other issues.
Youth acting like their issues are more important than the issues of anyone who's older than them, or that older people don't understand what it's like to be young, or who constantly whine about having to pay back loans they voluntarily signed on for to people who paid back their own debt and have never imagined the govt. would ever offer to wipe out their student loan debt have not yet reached that certain level of maturity or realization that the world doesn't revolve around their needs like when they were children. It's like telling a combat vet who did three tours in hell, 'I was 18 when I joined the army and a couple of years later they didn't offer to let me off the hook from the contract I signed when things got tough and I had to go to war - it's not fair!' Maturity wise, they're closer to angst ridden teenagers than adults. We've all been there. It's a stage of life. Most grow out of it. Some later than others.
|
|
|
2024
Nov 6, 2024 14:12:05 GMT -7
Post by EddieBlake on Nov 6, 2024 14:12:05 GMT -7
There are not enough genuinely progressive liberal thinkers to ever win an election based on numbers. The best bet. And I do not like it myself but it is probably the closest we ever will get and it is still a long shot. Is a break away party consisting of mostly moderate thinkers pulled from both parties that prioritize toned down liberal ideas while still appealing to the needs of average voters. Jobs, healthcare, environment, education and standing up against hatred and cooperate greed and toxic nationalism. While remaining patriotic and strong enough to pull from both sides. Not that I see it as a likely option. But I do feel it's safe to say anyone that I totally support would appear far to radical to ever have a real chance. Can't know if you don't try at all to appeal to them. There were enough Democrats to win in 2020, 2012, 2008... Covid didn't kill them exclusively. They went away because the DNC refused to progress at all and forced the rotting corpse of Joe Biden on to the ticket.
|
|
|
Post by bear on Nov 6, 2024 14:15:26 GMT -7
Maine voted to cap super PAC donations at $5k. It passed with 74% of the votes
|
|