|
|
Post by lordkundalini on Jul 19, 2016 11:07:59 GMT -7
|
|
|
|
Post by lordkundalini on Jul 19, 2016 11:12:36 GMT -7
im not typically one for posting the latest death but this makes me go hmmmmmmmm www.anonews.co/911-conspiracy-author-phillip-marshall-his-dog-and-2-kids-found-dead-in-california/Security Agency Officer Wayne Madsen says the 9/11 investigative author Philip Marshall and his children were killed in a “black ops hit” by the CIA, dismissing the suicide hypothesis. Marshall was afraid of being silenced for his revelations about 9/11, Madsen said, noting that a side door the investigator never used was wide open when his dead body was found. |
|
|
|
Post by lordkundalini on Jul 26, 2016 11:25:15 GMT -7
|
|
|
|
Post by lordkundalini on Jul 27, 2016 8:15:53 GMT -7
|
|
|
|
Post by Don Swifty on Jul 27, 2016 9:33:20 GMT -7
You shouldn't make assumptions as to what things I find to be interesting or not. I try to separate what is fact from what can only be considered fiction at the moment, but that has no bearing on my level of interest in a subject. When it comes to science fiction, I keep in mind the second word of that phrase, but I find the genre to be interesting.
|
|
|
|
Post by PooDolla on Jul 27, 2016 9:35:00 GMT -7
you're right. i don't find this interesting.
|
|
|
|
Post by lordkundalini on Jul 27, 2016 10:13:47 GMT -7
You shouldn't make assumptions as to what things I find to be interesting or not. I try to separate what is fact from what can only be considered fiction at the moment, but that has no bearing on my level of interest in a subject. When it comes to science fiction, I keep in mind the second word of that phrase, but I find the genre to be interesting. so do you find the article interesting? ill assume you dont and that i was right unless you tell me. . so does that mean you are going to stop assuming i mean what suits you instead of what i actually say. you know, pulling swifties. you do that frequently that would be awesome.. we could have a real discussion then. DMT entities are something are they not?.. do you have some evidence that they do not exist outside of the specific egoistic/mind? or perhaps they are separate entities. do you think the auyuhuasca shamans are delusional schizos when they talk about commuing with spirits or could there be something to that what evidence did you use to make your decision if you have.. id love to hear it.. i myself am not sure at all. reality i feel is just do complex to make judgements with the data at hand.. to rule anything out seems premature |
|
|
|
Post by Don Swifty on Jul 27, 2016 10:31:36 GMT -7
I thought this thread of yours was about what you find interesting. Not your (potentially false) assumptions on what I find not interesting. Maybe I should be flattered that you choose to use me as a frame of reference, but I don't see how I have anything at all to do with what it is that you find interesting. At best, you're making assumptions about me (and not at all about what you find interesting). At worst, those assumptions will be false. Here's a freebie of something that you don't have to make an assumption I won't be interested in: www.TheJoysOfSittingOnABumSprayedPortAuthorityPublicToiletSeat.com |
|
|
|
Post by lordkundalini on Jul 27, 2016 11:25:35 GMT -7
I thought this thread of yours was about what you find interesting. Not your (potentially false) assumptions on what I find not interesting. Maybe I should be flattered that you choose to use me as a frame of reference, but I don't see how I have anything at all to do with what it is that you find interesting. At best, you're making assumptions about me (and not at all about what you find interesting). At worst, those assumptions will be false. Here's a freebie of something that you don't have to make an assumption I won't be interested in: www.TheJoysOfSittingOnABumSprayedPortAuthorityPublicToiletSeat.comit is but its okay to expand the discussion if i choose right?, or does that only go for you.. so you dont want to have a discussion. just ego battles.. good enough.. ill stop trying.. ill just assume you think anyone who see entities on auyhuausca or DMT is a demented schizo til you tell me otherwise, based on your previous posts. i think you way off trusting psychiatrists so completely, given they never met a kid they didnt want to dope up on some pill. deep down i think you understand entities can exist and may exist but are to much of a pussy to admit it or even deny it for that matter. |
|
|
|
Post by Don Swifty on Jul 27, 2016 11:50:16 GMT -7
I may find something to be interesting, and I may find it to be possible, but I'm not quick to declare something to be "highly probable" or "what I think is actually going on" just because I think it's interesting and concurrently possible. I can be interested in something I don't believe in, don't put any faith in, don't believe is probable, don't believe is what is really going on, etc.. I'm quite good at understanding the differences between possible/speculation/fiction and probable/fact. I don't get too caught up in taking speculative fiction and trying to somehow make that into something that is probable or convince myself that it's what I think is actually going on. If you're thought process is different, whoopee. Vive le difference. Be interested in that which you choose to be interested in, but it's very.....telling......that you need to use me as a reference point by falsely assuming what I don't find to be interesting to describe what it is that you yourself find interesting.
If you're looking for a long, drawn out argument or an ego battle or whatever it is you want from me, I can tell you that you don't have to assume that it's something I'm not interested in. I'm not interested at all. In fact, I'm more interested in sitting on a bum sprayed NY/NJ Port Authority public restroom toilet seat than I am in getting drawn into an argument or anything else over any of this or anything that you find interesting. Notice I never once entered your thread to comment on the things you find interesting - only now to clarify and point out that you've got me wrong and it doesn't make sense to define what interests you by falsely assuming what doesn't interest me. Point made.
If you're looking for an argument, ego battle, etc., I think you'll have much better luck with that in your dead cat thread. Good luck finding what you're looking for. Namante.
|
|
|
|
Post by lordkundalini on Jul 27, 2016 13:12:33 GMT -7
I may find something to be interesting, and I may find it to be possible, but I'm not quick to declare something to be "highly probable" or "what I think is actually going on" just because I think it's interesting and concurrently possible. I can be interested in something I don't believe in, don't put any faith in, don't believe is probable, don't believe is what is really going on, etc.. I'm quite good at understanding the differences between possible/speculation/fiction and probable/fact. I don't get too caught up in taking speculative fiction and trying to somehow make that into something that is probable or convince myself that it's what I think is actually going on. If you're thought process is different, whoopee. Vive le difference. Be interested in that which you choose to be interested in, but it's very.....telling......that you need to use me as a reference point by falsely assuming what I don't find to be interesting to describe what it is that you yourself find interesting. If you're looking for a long, drawn out argument or an ego battle or whatever it is you want from me, I can tell you that you don't have to assume that it's something I'm not interested in. I'm not interested at all. In fact, I'm more interested in sitting on a bum sprayed NY/NJ Port Authority public restroom toilet seat than I am in getting drawn into an argument or anything else over any of this or anything that you find interesting. Notice I never once entered your thread to comment on the things you find interesting - only now to clarify and point out that you've got me wrong and it doesn't make sense to define what interests you by falsely assuming what doesn't interest me. Point made. If you're looking for an argument, ego battle, etc., I think you'll have much better luck with that in your dead cat thread. Good luck finding what you're looking for. Namante. we are in agreement then... ive been thinking about this kind of thing for decades, is that long enough?. i find it best to make few "decisions" on reality as possible.. i pretty much only believe what i need to conduct the now in the environment i find myself in. i think fluidity is necessary for sure in areas of the unknown. change is constant and i like everyone really have no clue what that really means, constant change, and how that relates to everything. what im looking for is something you clearly dont want to provide.. an honest discussion on the possibilities, probabilities ect. of beyond the material world. the fact that you offer up Psychiatrists theories, opinions ect as proof entities dont exist shows me you are not serious and are just playing games. Psychiatrists have no way to measure the non material planes and what may live in them and how they may interact with the material and i think you know that. yet you keep using the word schizo and attaching it to the debate as if everyone with and non material encounter is schizo.. that is simply not true and you know it.. im dealing with the Non schizo subset. my interest in the occult started in 1988ish when i was cleansed with a voodoo priest, a close personal friend and business partner at the time.. i bought the eggs myself and when cracked open the yolks had turned into this gooey blackness., i saw a entity form in my room, completely straight, had been for months. it formed hovered and fades. and of course ive been ego dead, my awareness had been places that were not the material world.. complete immersion and what are those DMT entities anyway. and of course you have logic. i feel my willingness to entertain the life in the non material has a firm base.. certainly not proof, but enough to raise legitimate questions. i also feel its important to you even if you believe what im laying out, to pick it apart using your swifty moves., telling me what i mean, expanding the argument ect to make it seem im wrong while never contradicting the specific thing you agree with me. its funny. namante to you as well kind soul. i truly hope you find what you are looking for. and please, dont take this so seriously.. lighten up a bit.. exude some joy once in a while |
|
|
|
Post by lerner on Jul 27, 2016 13:15:11 GMT -7
|
|
|
|
Post by lordkundalini on Aug 1, 2016 8:45:47 GMT -7
|
|
|
|
Post by lordkundalini on Aug 1, 2016 9:38:29 GMT -7
|
|
|
|
Post by lordkundalini on Aug 1, 2016 9:46:20 GMT -7
|
|
|
|
Post by lordkundalini on Aug 1, 2016 13:38:08 GMT -7
|
|
|
|
Post by lordkundalini on Aug 5, 2016 8:58:57 GMT -7
|
|
|
|
Post by lordkundalini on Aug 8, 2016 6:17:54 GMT -7
|
|
|
|
Post by lordkundalini on Aug 8, 2016 6:46:08 GMT -7
|
|
|
|
Post by lordkundalini on Aug 8, 2016 11:45:12 GMT -7
timewheel.net/tome-why-does-cannabis-cause-you-to-dream-less/glad i read this. i always wondered about why no dreams or no memory of them... turns out cannabis affects Rem or dream sleep but may allow you to be in deep slow wave sleep which is the healing sleep for more time which is a plus yeah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
